Telepathy

While practising telepathy, it has become my understanding that the cosmos is a sea of energy, which can translate to thoughts. We take from/receive and add to/send as we go through life. Most of us are unaware of the fact, so we do not know what came from us and from somewhere or someone else. People doing interspecies communication, remote viewing, mediumship, channelling, telepathy, etc. have all learnt how to recognise some thoughts or sensations they have as not being their own.

Interspecies or animal communicator Anna Breytenbach said in an interview with Heidi Stephenson:

“Not only the right brain picture consciousness. But we certainly don’t use the left brain as the primary way of knowing information either. It’s an holistic art and practise. We use both hemispheres of our brain and a whole lot more. Receiving intuitive information is not a mechanistic science. It’s not a mechanical process. It very much happens in the quantum world, in the vibrational world. But the closest approximation we can get to describing it is that the incoming raw data, the energy emissions, thoughts and feelings of the being we’re communicating with, land in our unconscious or intuitive knowing. The bad news is that we still don’t know about it consciously.

This incoming intuitive information runs against our personal, human, mental database of stored life experiences, mental images, vocabulary, physical sensations, concepts and understandings, and when the closest match is found in our internal library, in our brain, then the flag goes up. And that’s when a mental image might pop into our awareness or a word, or a smell, or an emotion perhaps.

It doesn’t mean that the animal is choosing to send us a word or mental image – that is purely an internal translation process. The left and the right brain are at play in the interpretation. If three people are sitting in front of the same animal, asking “What is your favourite toy?” one person might get a mental image of a green tennis ball, another might get the smell of a soggy, spit-filled tennis ball, and the third may telepathically receive the words “green tennis ball,” as if written in their mind’s eye.

On a deeper level though, what’s really happening is that the essence of our being is connecting with the essence of that other being. Our brains interpret consciously what we are receiving unconsciously or intuitively.“

Author and cancer survivor Anita Moorjani goes further. She suggests that many of our thoughts are actually loved ones who have left us trying to communicate with us. In this video, she talks at length about how we may Develop a Language with the Other Side. After watching this video, I realised that many of our thoughts are not our own but come from the space around us, either given or taken. An issue is that most of us are unable to distinguish them from thoughts that we formulated ourselves.

Science is making an effort to improve understanding of this thought transfer. The hundredth monkey effect is a phenomenon in which a new behaviour, which once learned by a critical number in a group, can be observed in other members who have not had contact. It was initially observed in Japan in 1952. Unfortunately, it was controversial because observations had not been reported correctly.

However, in recent years Rupert Sheldrake has done considerable research in the area. He writes:

“The morphic fields of social groups connect together members of the group even when they are many miles apart and provide channels of communication through which organisms can stay in touch at a distance. They help provide an explanation for telepathy. There is now good evidence that many animals are telepathic, and telepathy seems to be a normal means of animal communication, as discussed in my book Dogs That Know When Their Owners are Coming Home. Telepathy is normal, not paranormal, natural, not supernatural, and is also common between people, especially people who know each other well.”

Increasing world connectivity via the internet has enabled people to join a group, a community (I am using Discord) where at their convenience they can initiate an impromptu session to practice telepathy, often with good results. The idea is that what we want to receive is there, but we are too busy with distracting thoughts to recognise it.

The process follows something like the following:

• People practising agree who will send for 7 minutes.
• The selects an object, image or whatever they would like to send. Inform the start, then think about what they are sending and visualise it going out, perhaps down a pipe to those receiving. Being active while we do that may help, feel it in your hands, draw it, etc., But the more focus we have on what we want to send, the better.
• At the same time, the receiver meditates. But when something comes to mind, rather than acknowledging it and letting it go as is done in meditation, the receiver pauses and makes a note or drawing. The receiver tries not to interpret it, just note it. When this is done, they return to meditation.
• At the end of 7 minutes, the receivers will take a photo of their notes and post it to the feed. The sender, in return, posts what they were sending.

There are several historical observations, which I find interesting:

Multiple Discoveries

D.V. Isaeva writes: “Throughout history, major scientific breakthroughs and notable inventions have occurred simultaneously and independently among different thinkers and inventors, who, more often than not, had no direct contact with each other. The phenomenon is known as “multiple discovery”. This theory was documented in 1922 by sociologists William Ogburn and Dorothy Thomas. They presented a list of 148 examples and asked why a multiple discovery is so frequent in science. They emphasised two essential factors, as the cultural preparation and the development of scientific technique and instrumentation.”

Many examples are found throughout history.

Muses

The ancient Greeks considered the Muses as the inspirational goddesses of literature, science, and the arts. Could there be some truth in this? Not in the persona of the goddesses, but knowledge inspiration is somehow made available to an individual seeking it. Consider Star Trek, specifically the early episode “Metamorphosis” (Season 2, Episode 9. daily motion video, timestamp 30:00) Explaining how the universal translator works, James Kirk says:

“There are certain universal ideas and concepts common to all intelligent life. This device instantaneously compares the frequency of brain-wave patterns, selects those ideas and concepts it recognises, and then provides the necessary grammar.”

This quote is very similar to what Anna Breytenbach said in an interview with Heidi Stephenson mentioned previously.